Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 98 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-03-06 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.57 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cosmic black and Cosmic grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 509 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.42 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is much better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, getting a 98 score against 88.5. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has the newer 13 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G body is somewhat thicker and somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3200, a little better screen pixels density and a bit larger screen. The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a CPU that is very similar to Galaxy Z Flip's CPU, and although the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a larger amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G also has a back camera with way more megapixels, a much better 7680x4320 video quality and a lot larger camera sensor providing a way better image quality.
Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G features a much longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S20 Ultra 5G is a little more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.