Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's overall score of 88.5. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than the Galaxy Z Flip, it is noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker. These phones have Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12, so it provides you some extra features.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite better pixels amount per display inch. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher 108 mega pixels resolution camera, a much bigger sensor providing a much better image quality and a much higher video definition.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is also cheaper than the Galaxy Z Flip, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.