Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S25, having an 88.5 score against 82.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Samsung Galaxy S25 has Android 14. Galaxy Z Flip has a very superior performance than Galaxy S25. Both of them have 8 cpu cores and 8 GB of RAM.
Galaxy S25 features a better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit smaller display and a just a bit lower pixels density. Samsung Galaxy S25 counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S25 also has a lot higher video resolution, a way bigger sensor taking way higher quality photos and videos and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy S25 features greater battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S25, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy S25. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy S25, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.