Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | -- |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, with a 90.7 score against 88.5. Galaxy S25 Ultra is a extremely thinner and notably lighter device than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S25 Ultra has a more recent 14 version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12, so it counts with lots of additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a lot better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a little bit larger screen and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Galaxy S25 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a way higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in poorly lited situations, a much bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy S25 Ultra's memory to install games and applications is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's one, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S25 Ultra counts with a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.