Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Galaxy S5 Sport's 77.8 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip body is incredibly newer and thinner, but somewhat heavier than Galaxy S5 Sport. These phones use Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the previous 12 version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a way smaller screen and a little lower 1920 x 1080 resolution, it also counts with a little higher quantity of pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processor than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better camera than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a back-facing camera with much less MP and a lower (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a larger sensor.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, else you can save some dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S5 Sport, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.