Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a a lot newer and a little thinner cellphone than Galaxy S7, but it is also somewhat heavier. The Galaxy S7 features a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen density and a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has more RAM memory and a larger number of faster cores. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for taking images in low light situations and a smaller sensor capturing less light and washed colors, and they both have a back camera with a 12 mega-pixels and the same (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with faster video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S7, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S7. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get the Galaxy S7, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.