Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, with a general score of 88.5 against 77.6. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 12 operating system, so both should provide you all the same OS features. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's design is a lot thinner and incredibly lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip features a way better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution, a little bit better screen density and a little bit larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better camera than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because although it has a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, and they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has a bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy XCover 6 Pro features improved battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4050mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.