Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.04 x 5.22 x 0.22 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 8.32 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black Shadow |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 2020.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2184 x 1968 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy SM8650-AC (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is slightly better than Galaxy Z Flip, having a 91.1 score against 88.5. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition's design is much thinner but noticeably heavier than the Galaxy Z Flip. These devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has newer 14 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit worse pixels density, it also counts with a higher 1968 x 2184 resolution and a larger display. The Galaxy Z Flip has a much more powerful CPU than Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition also has a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4400mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Z Flip, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy Z Flip. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Fold Special Edition, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy Z Flip, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.