Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-12 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.68 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Grey |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 848.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 449 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than Xperia 5 II, having a global score of 88.5 against 87.2. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Xperia 5 II, and both were released with only a couple of months difference. Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better hardware performance than Xperia 5 II. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Sony Xperia 5 II features a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of display. Xperia 5 II counts with a greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB.
Xperia 5 II features longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity. The Sony Xperia 5 II captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a back camera with a 12 mega pixels, the Sony Xperia 5 II also has a much larger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos, a bigger diafragm aperture for better photos and video in low light environments and better video frame rates.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Xperia 5 II, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xperia 5 II. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Xperia 5 II, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.