Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-08-24 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.18 x 2.95 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 630 SDM630 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 508 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3580mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Xperia XA2 Plus, with a global score of 88.5 against 78.6. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Z Flip has older 12 version while Xperia XA2 Plus has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer device, and it is also lighter and extremely thinner than Xperia XA2 Plus.
Xperia XA2 Plus has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little lower 1080 x 2160 resolution, a quite smaller display and a just a bit less pixels per display inch. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior processor than Xperia XA2 Plus, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Sony Xperia XA2 Plus counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light images and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Sony Xperia XA2 Plus also counts with a way higher 23 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a larger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a quite bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Sony Xperia XA2 Plus, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. The Xperia XA2 Plus features just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 3580mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.