Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-06-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.14 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Pink, Red and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3840 x 2160 pixels (4K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 801 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 10.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3230mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Sony Xperia XZ Premium, with an 88.5 score against 79.8. The Galaxy Z Flip is a a lot newer cellphone, and it is also just a little bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Sony Xperia XZ Premium. The Xperia XZ Premium has a way better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher resolution of 2160 x 3840 pixels and a lot better pixels count per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better hardware performance than Xperia XZ Premium, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Sony Xperia XZ Premium shoots clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low-light images and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ Premium also counts with a back facing camera with lot more MP and a bigger camera sensor which gives a better photo and video quality.
Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Xperia XZ Premium, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy Z Flip has a little better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ Premium, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.