Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-04-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.31 x 2.56 x 0.48 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 483 pixels per inch |
| -- | 700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2870mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is much better than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, getting an 88.5 score against 79. The Galaxy Z Flip is a newer and noticeably thinner phone than the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, although it is also just a little heavier. Both of these devices have Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a little better processing power than Xperia XZ2 Compact, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM. The Xperia XZ2 Compact counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a way smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2160px, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixel density.
The Galaxy Z Flip has more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same (4K) video quality, the Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact also counts with a bigger back camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and photographs and a back camera with much more MP.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit better battery performance than Sony Xperia XZ2 Compact, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity instead of 2870mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.