Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2017-04-05 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.75 x 2.83 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.68 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (960 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Xperia XZs's global score of 77.2. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip is heavier than the Xperia XZs, it's thinner and also notably newer. Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better screen than Xperia XZs, because it has a bigger screen, a bit higher number of pixels in each display inch and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636.
Galaxy Z Flip features a very superior memory to install games and applications than Sony Xperia XZs, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better processing power than Sony Xperia XZs, because it has a greater number of faster cores and more RAM.
Sony Xperia XZs counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Sony Xperia XZs also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back camera, better 960 fps video frame rates and a larger sensor which provides a better image and video quality.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better battery duration than Xperia XZs, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy Z Flip is a lot more expensive than the Sony Xperia XZs, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.