Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-04-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.97 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is much better than the Xiaomi Black Shark, getting an 88.5 score against 80.4. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark has Android 9.0 Pie version. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer, thinner and just a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Black Shark.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Black Shark. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM. The Xiaomi Black Shark counts with a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels, a quite smaller screen and a just a little worse quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Black Shark, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, a camera with a 12 MP and the same video resolution, the Galaxy Z Flip also has faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a bigger camera sensor shooting better quality photos.
Xiaomi Black Shark has superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.