Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-03-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Black Shark 2's score of 82.3. Both of these phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Black Shark 2 has Android 10, counting with a couple nice extra features and performance tweaks. The Galaxy Z Flip design is newer, thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 2.
Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features a little sharper display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340px resolution, a little bit less pixels per inch of screen and a little bit smaller display. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 2. They have a 8 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Black Shark 2 also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor and a camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Black Shark 2, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Black Shark 2 features superior battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.