Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 90.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 7.00 x 3.28 x 0.40 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.83 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Blasting black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.1 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 484 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has a score of 90.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 score. Even being the best in this review, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro design is incredibly thicker and heavier than the Galaxy Z Flip. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro has the previous 10 version while Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM amount. The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a higher 1440 x 3120px resolution, a quite bigger screen and a quite higher number of pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro's storage capacity for games and applications is just as good as Galaxy Z Flip's one, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro also has a lot better resolution camera and a way bigger camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
Xiaomi Black Shark 3 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.