Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-04-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.45 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro's score of 78.7. These devices work with the same Android 12 OS, so you shouldn't perceive any difference regarding that. Galaxy Z Flip's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter than the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, even though it was released 2 years before.
Galaxy Z Flip has a brighter display than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro, and although they both have a same size display, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor, and they both have a same size aperture, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro also counts with a back facing camera with way more MP.
Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro counts with as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip one, both of them have equal internal memory capacity. Xiaomi Black Shark 5 Pro has a much better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 41% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.