Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-10-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.50 x 3.01 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.62 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cosmic black and Lunar silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 650 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 10T, with a score of 88.5 against 87.9. Even though the Galaxy Z Flip and Xiaomi Mi 10T were only released 8 months apart, the Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat lighter and noticeably thinner. Both devices in this review have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Mi 10T has Android 10 version, offering some additional features and performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Mi 10T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 10T has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a little bit lower screen density, they both have a same size display.
The Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking pictures or video in low light environments, it also counts with a much larger sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a way more megapixels back facing camera and a way higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Xiaomi Mi 10T, because it has more internal storage. Xiaomi Mi 10T counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.