Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-04-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 5.81 x 2.78 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 712 SDM712 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3070mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's 81.4 global score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is newer and just a little bit thinner than the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE's, but it's also heavier. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has the older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM. Xiaomi Mi 9 SE has a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit better display pixel density.
Xiaomi Mi 9 SE takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Mi 9 SE also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit superior battery lifetime than Xiaomi Mi 9 SE, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.