Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-06-17 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.17 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Carbon Black, Flame Red and Glacier Blue |
| Aluminum | Metal and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 430 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi 9T's overall score of 82.2. These phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Mi 9T has Android 10 version. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a thinner and a little bit lighter phone than the Xiaomi Mi 9T, even though they were only released with a couple months difference.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better performance than Xiaomi Mi 9T, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Mi 9T counts with a little bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a bit worse pixel amount per display inch and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels.
The Xiaomi Mi 9T captures better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Mi 9T also counts with a way bigger camera sensor capturing way better quality photos and videos and a lot more mega-pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi 9T, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Xiaomi Mi 9T has longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.