Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2018-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.22 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Green |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's 83.8 global score. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit better CPU than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3. Both have 8 GB of RAM and 8 processing cores.
The Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a just a bit worse pixel density, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen. Xiaomi Mi Mix 3's memory capacity to install applications and games is just as good as the Galaxy Z Flip one, they have the same 256 GB internal storage.
Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same sensor size, the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 aperture, the Xiaomi Mi Mix 3 also has a back-facing camera with more megapixels. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better battery duration than Xiaomi Mi Mix 3, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.