Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-14 | 2016-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.15 x 3.04 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black and Silver |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 516.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 23.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.69 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4070mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's 76 global score. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version and Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Galaxy Z Flip's design is incredibly newer and a little thinner than Xiaomi Mi Note 2's, although it's also just a little heavier.
Galaxy Z Flip features a slightly better display than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a little higher pixel density, a larger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip captures better photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a back camera with way less mega pixels, it also counts with a larger aperture and a bigger sensor. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, because it has more internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Note 2 has better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4070mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Mi Note 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Xiaomi Mi Note 2. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get Xiaomi Mi Note 2, letting go a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.