Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-05-12 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, having an 88.5 score against 87.9. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has Android 10 version, offering some additional features. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a lighter and thinner phone than the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, even when both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little bit less pixels per inch in the screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, they both have a display with the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for low-light photos, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a lot better image quality, a back camera with way more mega pixels and a much better 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.