Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 87.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-03-27 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.01 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.91 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Arctic white, Deep Ocean blue and Night black |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4520mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco F3, having an 88.5 score against 87.3. Both of these devices include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco F3 has Android 11 version, providing some additional features and improved performance. Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Xiaomi Poco F3, but it is just a little thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
Xiaomi Poco F3 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Xiaomi Poco F3 has just a bit better display than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower display density and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400px, they both have a same size display.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with much more storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Poco F3, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Xiaomi Poco F3 features a very superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4520mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. Xiaomi Poco F3 has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a same size aperture, the Xiaomi Poco F3 also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.