Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-07-14 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Green and Greener, Out of the Blue and Two Shades of Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is much better than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro's score of 78.7. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has Android 10. The Galaxy Z Flip is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, even when both were only released 5 months apart.
Galaxy Z Flip has a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a little more pixels per display inch and a little bit higher 1080 x 2636 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a greater storage to install applications and games than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro also counts with a much better resolution back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M2 Pro has a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 52 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.