Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-05-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cool Blue, POCO Yellow and Power Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G's 80.8 overall score. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's construction is somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, despite of the fact that it was released just a little further than a year before. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G has Android 11.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit sharper screen than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has a little bigger display, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit faster processing unit than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G shoots slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G, because it has 192 GB more internal memory capacity. Xiaomi POCO M3 Pro 5G counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.