Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-02-11 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Xiaomi Poco X2, getting an 88.5 score against 79.3. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Poco X2, although both were released only 0 months apart. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco X2 has Android 11 version.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a slightly better display than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a little better pixels number in each inch of display. Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X2 takes much clearer videos and photos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for shooting photos and/or video in low light situations and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a much bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a camera in the back with a much higher 64 mega pixels resolution.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a much bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X2, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.