Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is slightly better than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC's 81.6 score. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip construction is way thinner and lighter than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, although they were only released with a few months difference. Both of these devices work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a newer 12 version while Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a quite inferior amount of pixels per inch in the screen, they both have a display with the same size.
Galaxy Z Flip has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a lot better image quality.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a very superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 56 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.