Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-03-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Frost blue, Metal bronze and Phantom black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, with an 88.5 score against 83.4. Both of these phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version and Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro has Android 11. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is an older phone than the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, but Samsung managed to make it somewhat lighter and thinner.
The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior processor than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a little higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution and a just a bit higher count of pixels in each screen inch.
The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 56 percent bigger battery size.
Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro shoots just a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Xiaomi Poco X3 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with way more mega pixels and a way bigger camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.