Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-03-23 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Laser Black, Laser Blue and POCO Yellow |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 696 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, with a global score of 88.5 against 76.7. The Galaxy Z Flip construction is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, even though it was released 2 years before. Both of these phones come with the same Android 12 OS (Operating System).
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a much better performance than Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a bit lower pixel amount in each inch in the screen, they both have a display of the same size.
Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for shooting photographs and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a way better 108 MP resolution camera in the back. The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G counts with a bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1 TB.
The Xiaomi POCO X4 Pro 5G features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.