Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Carbon gray, Ocean green, Sunrise orange and Twilight blue |
| Aluminum | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is better than Xiaomi Redmi 9T's 78.2 general score. The Galaxy Z Flip is an older cellphone than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, but Samsung was able to build it extremely thinner and just a little lighter. Both phones we compare here come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi 9T has Android 10.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because it has a little higher pixels density, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit superior CPU than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi 9T shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower video frame rate, and they both have a same size aperture and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi 9T also counts with a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a way better 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bigger memory to install games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi 9T, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi 9T features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.