Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-04-20 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 199.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 678 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10's general score of 78.3. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 has Android 11, giving you some nice extra features. The Galaxy Z Flip is an older and just a little bit heavier phone than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, but Samsung made it thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Z Flip features a bit better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit smaller screen, a just a little inferior pixels count in each inch in the screen and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has more storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip takes a little bit better pictures and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, although it has a camera with a way worse 12 mega-pixels resolution and a way smaller sensor, they both have a F1.8 aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10 counts with a much longer battery life than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.