Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-04-28 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.32 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Lake Green, Onyx Gray and Pebble White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 229.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55 and Arm Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Arm Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a score of 88.5, which is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S's global score of 78.2. Despite of the fact Galaxy Z Flip is older and a little heavier than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Z Flip has newer 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has Android 11 version, providing the user a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little better performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a higher amount of RAM memory. Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a little smaller display, a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a little less pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Z Flip features just a bit better camera than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, although it has a back camera with much less MP, they both have a F1.8 camera aperture. The Galaxy Z Flip features a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, because it has more internal storage capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 10S, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.