Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 920 MT6877T (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is just a bit better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro's 86.1 overall score. The Galaxy Z Flip body is lighter and thinner than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has Android 11, so it offers some additional features and enhanced performance.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also has a better resolution of 2080 x 2400 pixels and a little better pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little faster processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro takes better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot higher 108 MP resolution.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro has a really longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5160mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.