Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | -- |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Atlantic Blue, Graphite Gray and Polar White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 2080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Flip is better than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with an 88.5 score against 77.1. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Z Flip has the newer 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has Android 11. Galaxy Z Flip's body is somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also has a little bit greater pixel density and a better 2080 x 2400px resolution. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a really superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Z Flip also has 2 GB more RAM.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also counts with a back camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a slightly bigger memory for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G has a superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.