Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 91.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2022-11-01 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.41 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.32 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 900 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 13.97 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, with a score of 91.5 against 88.5. These devices work with the same Android 12 OS (operating system). Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer's body is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker.
Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer. Both of them have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount. Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer counts with just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a bit lower display pixels density and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400, they both have a same size display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer both count with similar memory to store more apps and games, both of them have exactly the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer has longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 4300mAh battery size.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Explorer also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in poorly lited environments, a lot more MP back camera and a much larger sensor shooting much better quality photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.