Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 13 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | -- |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip is better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, having a score of 88.5 against 77.1. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has an older 12 version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version. Galaxy Z Flip features a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro. Both of them have the same RAM amount and 8 CPU cores.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a little more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip, although it has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a just a little worse display density, they both have a same size display. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a much greater memory for applications and games than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro also has a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1 TB.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a superior camera than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a much bigger sensor shooting much higher quality photos, a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and video. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has a really longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.