Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-02-14 | 2019-01-15 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.18 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has an overall score of 88.5, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7's general score of 80.3. Galaxy Z Flip is a newer cellphone, and it is also a bit lighter and somewhat thinner than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a little better processing power than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Z Flip features a bit more vivid screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because it has a quite bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2636 pixels and a little bit greater pixel density. The Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little bit more storage for applications and games than Xiaomi Redmi Note 7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 features greater battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 21 percent more battery capacity. Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 counts with a better camera than Galaxy Z Flip, and although they both have the same video resolution and the same aperture, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 7 also has a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels, a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and better video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.