Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 83 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-01-18 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.37 x 3.04 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Daybreak purple and Nightfall black |
| Aluminum | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 425 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 800U chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A76 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, having an 88.5 score against 83. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is older than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, it's body is a bit lighter and much thinner. Both phones in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Flip has 12 version and Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features.
The Galaxy Z Flip has just a bit better looking screen than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because it has a bit larger screen, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2636px and a quite greater count of pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a little faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9T also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos and a much more megapixels back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.