Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.5 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | ZTE |
| Android 12, 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-14 | 2021-06-04 |
| 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches | 6.36 x 2.87 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.46 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Mirror black and Mirror purple | Black, Gold, Green and White |
| Aluminum | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1380.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2636 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 425 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.3 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 35.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4600mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a global score of 88.5, which is better than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra's 78.1 global score. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but the Galaxy Z Flip has a more recent 12 version while ZTE Axon 30 Ultra has Android 11, so it counts with some extra features and performance improvements. Although the Galaxy Z Flip is older than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, it's design is a little thinner and a little bit lighter.
Galaxy Z Flip features a little better performance than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra. Both of them have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a bit sharper screen than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a just a bit higher display density and a slightly higher 1080 x 2636 pixels resolution.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra shoots much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has a way higher video quality, a back-facing camera with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution and a bigger aperture to take better low light photography and videos. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, because it has more internal memory.
The ZTE Axon 30 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4600mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip costs a lot more than the ZTE Axon 30 Ultra, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.