Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x, 14.x |
| 2020-09-18 | 2020-10-23 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.82 x 0.29 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.66 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Gold, Graphite, Pacific blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A14 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2815mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a little bit better than the iPhone 12 Pro, having a score of 94.6 against 92.8. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is just a bit thinner but extremely heavier than the iPhone 12 Pro, and they were only released 1 months apart. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 works with Android 11 operating system, while iPhone 12 Pro counts with iOS 15.x operating system.
Apple iPhone 12 Pro has a better display than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 pixels, it also counts with a little bit higher screen pixel density. The iPhone 12 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 features just a bit better camera than iPhone 12 Pro, although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for taking photographs and video in low-light situations, they both have the same video frame rate, a 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 12 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 2815mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Apple iPhone 12 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Apple iPhone 12 Pro. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Apple iPhone 12 Pro, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.