Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 93.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 15.x |
| 2020-09-18 | 2021-09-24 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.20 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2532 x 1170 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 457 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.71 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is slightly better than iPhone 13 Pro, getting a 94.6 score against 93.3. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 works with Android 11 operating system, while iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x operating system. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is just a little thinner than the iPhone 13 Pro, but it is heavier and was released a little bit more than a year before.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1170 x 2532 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit higher display pixel density. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 2 less cores (but faster) and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU. Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone 13 Pro, because it has a 45 percent greater battery size.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots slightly better photos and videos than iPhone 13 Pro, although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and video in low light situations, they both have the same video quality, a 12 mega pixels resolution camera and the same 60 fps video frame rates.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the iPhone 13 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the iPhone 13 Pro. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the iPhone 13 Pro, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.