Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 95.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | iOS 16.x |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-09-16 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.81 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2556 x 1179 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 461 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple GPU 5-core GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.8 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro has a score of 95.6, which is a little bit better than Galaxy Z Fold 2's score of 94.6. IPhone 14 Pro's construction is newer and way lighter, but also thicker than Galaxy Z Fold 2. The iPhone 14 Pro works with iOS 16.x operating system, and Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with Android 11 operating system.
The iPhone 14 Pro has a better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a 64-bit processor. IPhone 14 Pro has an incredibly better looking screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1179 x 2556px, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per display inch.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more memory capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 14 Pro, because it has more internal storage capacity. Apple iPhone 14 Pro captures slightly better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, the same video quality and the same camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro also has a back-facing camera with much more MP.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Apple iPhone 14 Pro, because it has a 41% greater battery size.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro is not only the best phones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.