Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 372 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.81 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than the Apple iPhone XR's overall score of 82. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is newer and somewhat thinner than Apple iPhone XR's, but it's also extremely heavier. The Apple iPhone XR has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, although it has a bit smaller display, a lot worse resolution of 828 x 1792 pixels and a quite worse display pixel density.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has much more storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone XR, because it has more internal memory. The iPhone XR has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has 9 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bits processing unit.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a really longer battery life than iPhone XR, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have the same aperture, the same (4K) video quality, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a lot larger camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Apple iPhone XR, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Apple iPhone XR. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Apple iPhone XR, letting go a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.