Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 12 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2022-09-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 8.43 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Space Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2448 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is much better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D's 79.8 general score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is thinner than Asus ROG Phone 6D, but it's somewhat heavier and was released 2 years before. These phones include Android operating system, but Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the older 11 version and Asus ROG Phone 6D has Android 12 version.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a lot better performance than Asus ROG Phone 6D, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Asus ROG Phone 6D features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1080 x 2448px resolution, it also counts with a little better screen density.
Asus ROG Phone 6D captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution, a larger back camera sensor capturing better quality pictures and a much higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Asus ROG Phone 6D's memory for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 one, both have equal 256 GB internal storage capacity. Asus ROG Phone 6D features superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.