Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Asus |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-02-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.07 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Pink and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, getting a 94.6 score against 76.2. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a incredibly newer and thinner device than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, although it is also much heavier. The Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a slightly better screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way worse resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch of display.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom counts with a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little bit better camera than Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have the same resolution back facing camera and the same (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a way better image quality and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Asus ZenFone 3 Zoom has a bit better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because it has an 11 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.