Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 5.1, 5.0 |
| 2020-09-18 | 2014-10-15 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.27 x 0.40 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 1019.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 490 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.45 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3220mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 330 hours standby time 24 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is much better than the Google Nexus 6, having a score of 94.6 against 81.1. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 design is extremely newer and a lot thinner than the Google Nexus 6's, but it is extremely heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has newer 11 version while Google Nexus 6 has Android 5.1.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a little better processing power than Google Nexus 6, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with 9 GB more RAM memory and a larger number of cores. Google Nexus 6 has a sharper screen than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels density.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Nexus 6, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3220mAh.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 takes better photographs and videos than Google Nexus 6, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video quality and a worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low light images and videos.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way more expensive than Google Nexus 6, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.