Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2016-10-20 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.66 x 2.74 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Gray and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.81 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2770mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a general score of 94.6, which is better than the Google Pixel's 80.2 global score. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is noticeably newer and much thinner, but extremely heavier than the Google Pixel. Google Pixel counts with just a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a lot lower 1080 x 1920 resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a little better amount of pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a superior performance than Google Pixel, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cores. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel, because although it has a back-facing camera with a worse resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photography and video and a lot larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really longer battery duration than Google Pixel, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 2770mAh.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Google Pixel, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some money and get the Google Pixel, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.