Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a score of 94.6, which is much better than the Google Pixel 2 XL's 82.5 score. Galaxy Z Fold 2's body is incredibly newer and thinner than Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it's also heavier. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit more powerful processor than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM.
Google Pixel 2 XL has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher amount of pixels per screen inch and a quite better 1440 x 2880 resolution. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 has just a bit better camera than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a worse 12 MP resolution back facing camera, and they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger sensor which offers a much higher photo and video quality.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features much more memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with superior battery performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 2 XL. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Google Pixel 2 XL, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.