Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.6 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-09-18 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.95 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Mystic black and Mystic bronze | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1930.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.6 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2208 x 1768 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 372 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 650 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.81 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.45 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a global score of 94.6, which is better than Google Pixel 3's 80 score. Even though the Galaxy Z Fold 2 is noticeably heavier than Google Pixel 3, it's somewhat thinner and newer. Google Pixel 3 has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a way lower resolution of 1080 x 2160 pixels and a way smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 256 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a little faster processing unit than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a very superior battery lifetime than Google Pixel 3, because it has a 54% more battery capacity. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 3, because although it has a camera with lesser MP resolution and a lower (4K) video definition, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy Z Fold 2 also counts with a lot bigger back camera sensor taking way better quality photos and videos.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it is way more expensive than Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save some dollars and get the Google Pixel 3, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.